Reading and Media Resources: Calif., Mass., Md., Conn., Ill., Mich., Nev., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., Oreg., Pa., R.I., Vt., Wash., D.C., and City of New York v. DAVID BERNHARDT, WILBUR ROSS, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE

Calif., Mass., Md., Conn., Ill., Mich., Nev., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., Oreg., Pa., R.I., Vt., Wash., D.C., and City of New York v. DAVID BERNHARDT, WILBUR ROSS, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE

Publication Year

2020

File

States Complaint - To Accompany 2020-05-25 Digest Issue No 32.pdf

A federal judge in California has dismissed two (1, 2) lawsuits filed by environmental and animal protection groups challenging the federal government’s recent rollbacks of the Endangered Species Act, saying that the groups failed to establish standing. A similar lawsuit brought by a coalition of states, however, survived. [To accompany Federal Case Law Update "Lawsuits Challenging Environmental Species Act Rollbacks Dismissed" from Brooks Animal Law Digest Issue No. 32.]

Calif., Mass., Md., Conn., Ill., Mich., Nev., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., Oreg., Pa., R.I., Vt., Wash., D.C., and City of New York v. DAVID BERNHARDT, WILBUR ROSS, US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE

Subscribe to the Brooks Animal Law Digest