Rise for Animals, et al. v. Elizabeth Goldentyer, et al.
Rise for Animals and the Animal Legal Defense Fund, represented by Harvard Law School’s Animal Law and Policy Clinic, filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in their lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) decision to deny plaintiffs’ petition for the USDA to update its requirements for the psychological wellbeing of nonhuman primates used in scientific research. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.
[To accompany Federal Court Case Law Update "Advocacy Groups File Motion for Summary Judgment in Case Challenging USDA’s Refusal to Update Primate Regulations" from Brooks Animal Law Digest Issue No. 149.]