Skip to main content
Opens in a new window
Home

Main navigation

  • About
    • Mission
    • Vision
    • Officers and Staff
    • Board of Trustees
  • A New Approach
    • Ethos
    • Major Initiatives
    • Lead Facilitator
  • Think Tank
    • Operating Committees
    • Executive Committee
    • Fellows & Scholars
    • Advisors
  • Resources
    • Brooks Papers
    • Brooks Videos
    • Fellowships
    • Institute Forums
    • Suggested Reading and Media
  • News & Events
    • Brooks Animal Law Digest
    • Calendar of Events
    • News
  • Contact

Brooks Animal Law Digest - Issue No. 18 (February 24, 2020)

  BACK TO DIGEST INDEX

This Week's Spotlights

Legislative Updates/Pending Federal Actions
Legislation Would Require Disclosure of a Companion Animal’s Health History and Related AWA Violations
February 18, 2020

H.R. 5715, or the Petfax Act of 2020, would require any commercial entity selling cats or dogs to provide the purchaser of the animal with a report detailing the animal’s background. The report would be required to disclose the name of the dealer who raised the animal, the number of other animals that dealer had raised in the last prior years, a listing of any Animal Welfare Act violations that dealer had committed in the prior two years, the animal’s date of birth, and the date of their most recent examination by a licensed veterinarian. The legislation would exclude not-for-profit animal shelters from these requirements.

Case Law Updates/Federal Case Law Updates
FWS Applied Unlawful Heightened Standard of Review to Section 7 Endangered Species Act Consultation for Jaguars’ Critical Habitat
February 10, 2020

A District Court in Arizona has ruled that the Fish and Wildlife Service improperly used a heightened standard of review in determining whether an agency action is “likely” to jeopardize the continued existence of any threatened or endangered species during a Section 7 Consultation. The court found that the agency, rather than applying its established standard of “more likely than not,” improperly applied a heightened standard of “very probable.” The court remanded the issue to the agency, requiring that it redo its Biological Opinion using a proper “more likely than not” standard.

Case Law Updates/State Case Law Updates
New York Court Denies Habeas Corpus Relief for Happy the Elephant
February 18, 2020

New York Supreme Court Justice Tuitt has “regretfully” denied the Nonhuman Rights Project’s request for habeas corpus relief for an elephant named Happy currently confined to the Bronx Zoo. The decision was based on binding precedent by the state’s Appellate Division. The Nonhuman Rights Project has stated it will appeal the decision.

Academic Updates/Articles
Impact of Animal Agriculture on Human Rights
February 18, 2020

A new article published in the Journal of Food Law & Policy begins to explore the global human rights repercussions of animal agriculture, focusing on the role of government in creating these systems.

Legislative Updates

Pending Federal Actions
Legislation Would Require Disclosure of a Companion Animal’s Health History and Related AWA Violations
February 18, 2020

H.R. 5715, or the Petfax Act of 2020, would require any commercial entity selling cats or dogs to provide the purchaser of the animal with a report detailing the animal’s background. The report would be required to disclose the name of the dealer who raised the animal, the number of other animals that dealer had raised in the last prior years, a listing of any Animal Welfare Act violations that dealer had committed in the prior two years, the animal’s date of birth, and the date of their most recent examination by a licensed veterinarian. The legislation would exclude not-for-profit animal shelters from these requirements.

Case Law Updates

Federal Case Law Updates
FWS Applied Unlawful Heightened Standard of Review to Section 7 Endangered Species Act Consultation for Jaguars’ Critical Habitat
February 10, 2020

A District Court in Arizona has ruled that the Fish and Wildlife Service improperly used a heightened standard of review in determining whether an agency action is “likely” to jeopardize the continued existence of any threatened or endangered species during a Section 7 Consultation. The court found that the agency, rather than applying its established standard of “more likely than not,” improperly applied a heightened standard of “very probable.” The court remanded the issue to the agency, requiring that it redo its Biological Opinion using a proper “more likely than not” standard.

Environmental Groups Announce Intent to Challenge CWA Rule Under ESA
February 18, 2020

Thirteen environmental groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Food Safety, gave formal notice of their intent to sue the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for violating the Endangered Species Act. The groups allege that the agencies violated the Endangered Species Act when they finalized a rule re-defining the scope of waters protected under the Clean Water Act without engaging in mandatory Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act.

State Case Law Updates
New York Court Denies Habeas Corpus Relief for Happy the Elephant
February 18, 2020

New York Supreme Court Justice Tuitt has “regretfully” denied the Nonhuman Rights Project’s request for habeas corpus relief for an elephant named Happy currently confined to the Bronx Zoo. The decision was based on binding precedent by the state’s Appellate Division. The Nonhuman Rights Project has stated it will appeal the decision.

Agency Updates

FWS Seeks Input on Polar Bear Den Model
February 18, 2020

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has announced the availability of a peer-reviewed scientific manuscript and associated model regarding potential impacts to maternal polar bear dens of seismic surveys. The agency is seeking feedback on this until April 20, 2020 and will hold two webinars on the publication on March 19 and March 20, 2020.

Academic Updates

Articles
Impact of Animal Agriculture on Human Rights
February 18, 2020

A new article published in the Journal of Food Law & Policy begins to explore the global human rights repercussions of animal agriculture, focusing on the role of government in creating these systems.

Other Updates

Dairy Farmers of America to Purchase Dean Foods
February 17, 2020

Following milk supplier Dean Foods’ bankruptcy last year, Dairy Farmers of America has agreed to pay $425 million to acquire 44 of the company’s facilities and certain corporate assets. The deal is subject to approval by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Hormel to Cease Use of Ractopamine
February 18, 2020

Food giant Hormel Corps has announced that it will join other large pork companies in stopping the use of growth drug ractopamine. The company will no longer purchase animals that have been fed or exposed to the drug beginning April 1.

Subscribe to the Brooks Animal Law Digest

Receive content directly to your inbox with weekly updates of the newest and most important happenings in the field of animal law. Subscriptions are free as a public resource and service.

SUBSCRIBE
Contact
1755 S. Naperville Road, Suite 100
Wheaton, IL 60189-5844
855.BROOKSA (855.276.6572)
info@theBrooksInstitute.org

Footer menu

  • About Us
    • Mission
    • Contact
    • Support
  • Resources
    • Brooks Papers
    • Brooks Videos
    • Suggested Reading
  • News
    • Brooks Animal Law Digest
    • Calendar of Events
© 2021 The Brooks Institute for Animal Rights Law & Policy, Inc.
Privacy Policy